早在2023年夏天，就有过他可能转会米兰的传闻，但最终红黑军团一口气签下了赖因德斯、穆萨、奇克3名中场，而拉齐奥从法兰克福免签了日本人。
摘要：大洋彼岸，脑机接口的热度也巨高不下。
要想赢得这项锦标，每个人都必须付出百分之百的努力。
1、博鱼手机 01 芯片设计业，存储封神 存储业，全是流量明星 如果说2026年半导体有“流量顶流”和“赚钱之王”，那一定是存储芯片。
这些长线资金的配置行为，构成了一道看不见的底部支撑。博鱼手机简历空着的时候，用项目作品去填。
2、离谱到极致！世界杯半区贫富差距炸裂！葡法地狱渡劫，阿根廷躺赢
利物浦正准备向布拉德利·巴尔科拉提出报价，以期在今夏填补萨拉赫离队后留下的空缺。
3、旅客称带娃坐火车总被分上铺，取消3次后被限购，12306回应！这份购票攻略请收好→
被裁员，可能被解释为“职业倦怠”；遇到难相处的领导，对方可能立刻被诊断成“NPD”；没有行动力，是“低能量”；不敢争取，是“低配得感”；关系出现争吵，则可能是对方缺乏情绪价值、突破了自己的边界。
4、美国会要让特朗普“踩刹车”，众院通过议案要求停止对伊朗军事行动
另外，经营现金流46.97 亿美元，依然覆盖不了资本投入——自由现金流转负至 -10.92 亿美元。
5、内讧？名记曝火箭球员不清楚KD怎么了 阿门：我认为他心情不错
哈兰德近期非常火爆，但足球还是整体11人的运动，这点英格兰更胜一筹。
原生家庭告诉我们从哪里来，主体性提醒我们谁在掌舵，奥德赛时期则安慰我们：暂时没有靠岸，也可以算作航程的一部分。
在“C罗与梅西谁是史上最佳”的选项中，C罗目前以超过10万票、占比62%的结果大幅领先梅西。
6、国家队收房子，老破小出现新信号
2025年11月底，超卓航科首次披露易主方案，实控人家族与湖北交投资本达成协议，拟以每股41.16元转让20.93%股份，对应总价7.72亿元，湖北省国资委将成为上市公司新实控人。
图赫尔在那个时间点做出那样的换人，等于在说'我不相信这支球队'，或者说他不相信他们还能给阿根廷再补几拳。
7、世界杯最大爽剧！特朗普来护航也没用，比利时打烂潜规则
圆梦诺坎普：从遥不可及到梦想成真 对于年仅19岁的埃斯帕特而言，2026年堪称梦幻。
但半导体设备是典型的成长股，不能只看当下利润。
8、日本置业中介推荐：2026年7月最新推荐，找到最适配投资需求的专属答案
可惜下半场体能下降后防线被冲垮，60分钟后连续丢球，最终输掉比赛。
作为“老大哥”，哈兰德对这位远离故土的英格兰小弟关照有加。
一家硬件大厂，愿意把最敏感的操作系统级权限无保留开放给外部大模型，这在两年前还是不可想象的。
9、中卫足球小将斩获全区青训精英赛U9组别亚军
小组赛阶段，斯卡洛尼的球队展现出稳定的统治力：首轮3比0轻取阿尔及利亚，次轮2比0完胜奥地利，末轮3比1击败约旦，三战全胜积9分以J组头名出线，打进8球仅丢1球，攻防两端表现均衡。
25/26赛季结束后，AC米兰开始经历大动荡。
10、生物量子相干修复舱
伊布主张让斯洛特担任主教练，普拉内斯担任体育总监，而卡尔迪纳莱则青睐朗尼克和格拉斯纳的路线。
根据官方消息，阿莫林正式出任AC米兰一线队主帅，他的到来可能会直接影响到球队头号球星莱奥的未来，尽管此前葡萄牙人已经自宣离队。
1、依维柯和福特的合作全新卡车驾驶室，将于2028年推出
新帅多尼斯4月上任后，球队防守端进步明显，刚刚0-0逼平了世界排名第14的塞内加尔。
2、蓝思科技(06613)与Intel Corporation签署了合作备忘录
加拿大主打高位逼抢和边路突破，南非主打密集防守和快速反击，从风格上看，南非的战术其实更克制加拿大。
3、自私的人先享受世界。
属于他的传奇只是按下了暂停键，那些未能跨越的遗憾，或许正是他下一篇章最深刻的伏笔。CBA最新消息！上海惨遭围攻，卢伟带头欺骗，怀特塞德违禁还能打背面是算力极限承压 技术高光背面，是算力的极限承压。
4、在云南吃一次苦，天灵盖都要被掀开
属于多米尼克·索博斯洛伊的安菲尔德传奇，才刚刚写下序章。
5、大卫贝克团队用AI构建可编程荧光标签，利用生成式蛋白实现高精度多目标荧光成像
"泰恩塔说。
6、【今日信息】中卫上百个岗位紧急招聘中…7月19日
同时球队阵容也不逊于米兰，阿囧还能够得到去年夏天红黑军团求购未果的霍伊伦。
根据瑞幸咖啡2026年一季度财报，截至今年3月31日，瑞幸海外门店总数已达177家。
现在卡迪纳莱下定决心彻底改革管理架构，就是要从根本上解决这些问题。
7、八马上市迈入发展新阶段 携APEC国际背书彰显中国茶全球竞争力
此次调整的背后，是耐克多年来在中国市场长期分散的线上经销体系造成价格混战、新品频繁破发，持续稀释品牌溢价。
因为面对Kimi K3，企业和开发者都会直接评估是继续用OpenAI、Anthropic的模型，还是用来自中国的开源模型。
8、啃老！37岁杜兰特场均登场36.4分钟 季后赛能否走得很远？
” 另据此前的消息，马竞已经通知阿尔瓦雷斯，在参加完上周日的世界杯决赛后，需于8月10日归队报到训练。
纸面实力上英格兰阵容厚度更优，全队身价接近14亿欧元。
在经历了总监海选失败后，AC米兰老板卡迪纳莱痛定思痛，正在考虑深入变革俱乐部管理层，不再设置体育总监和技术总监职位，准备组建一套由加迪纳和阿尔姆施塔特参与的战略团队，新帅阿莫林将兼顾经理人角色，深度参与转会市场。
接下来，姆巴佩将在三四名决赛后返回皇马。
关联文章推荐
- 1 克罗地亚的核心依然是40岁的莫德里奇。
- 2 过去几个赛季，米兰在管理层面的混乱一直是球队成绩不稳定的重要原因。
- 3 收购完成后，中际装备更名为中际旭创，主营业务切换为光模块。
- 4 但所有人都清楚，只要梅西能带领阿根廷在决赛中击败西班牙，成功卫冕世界杯，他将以“史无前例的双世界杯核心”身份，毫无争议地捧起个人第九座金球奖。
- 5 ” 事实上，图赫尔本人在32强赛击败刚果民主共和国后，曾详细谈及赖斯的身体状况。
- 6 但对手南非下半场少打一人，墨西哥进攻效率仍有提升空间，16次射门仅4次射正。
- 7 冬窗时他就受到土超球队的强烈追逐，是阿莱格里的坚持把他留到了赛季末，但现在球员离队的想法非常坚决。
- 8 克勒舍与法兰克福的合同要到 2028 年 6 月 30 日才到期，米兰需要支付一笔违约金才能将他从合同中解放出来。
- 9 漫长的康复期也意味着他错过了2024年欧洲杯——脚踝恢复情况远未达到预期。
- 10 另一方面，另一主要进口来源国津巴布韦的锂矿出口禁令牵动中国市场的神经：2026年2月25日，津巴布韦出台锂矿出口禁令，之后市场预判原料收紧时间从持续1个月到超出预期，助推碳酸锂价格上行；但4月14日当地批复华友钴业（603799.SH）、盛新锂能（002240.SZ）等6家规模企业获得出口配额，市场预期这些原料将于8月前后陆续抵达中国。
- 11 Nexfin News — China’s lithium battery industry is undergoing a rite of passage, transitioning from wild expansion to disciplined competition. In the first half of the year, a rare divergence between surging corporate earnings and falling stock prices brought a permanent shift in the sector’s underlying dynamics into sharp focus. By mid-July, A-share lithium battery stocks pulled back despite dramatic midyear earnings forecasts. Tianqi Lithium projected net profit growth of up to 4,935% year-over-year, EVE Energy forecast a 95% to 110% increase, and both Sunwoda and REPT BATTERO turned profitable again. Across the supply chain—from upstream lithium salts to downstream battery makers—most companies reported substantial operational gains. Yet robust earnings failed to stop equity valuations from sliding. On July 8, Chengxin Lithium hit its daily downside limit, Yahua Group dropped over 15%, and Tinci Materials saw more than 30 billion yuan in market value evaporate within a week. Ganfeng Lithium has fallen roughly 38% from its peak, while market leader CATL is down about 20%. The immediate trigger for the selloff was the resumption of operations at CATL’s Jianxiawo lithium mine. On June 29, the mine secured its safety production permit, which was officially posted on the Credit China website on July 7. The site—the world’s largest single lepidolite mine—had been idle for over ten months. With an annual capacity of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate, it previously accounted for 8% to 10% of China’s total output. Its return brings over 45,000 tons of additional supply in the second half of the year, hitting elevated lithium prices head-on. Futures markets reacted instantly: on June 18, as restart speculation grew, the main lithium carbonate contract fell 6.58% in a single session, beginning a steady slide from its May high of 205,000 yuan per ton. This stark contrast between thriving industrial output and falling stock prices coincided on the surface with lithium carbonate pulling back rapidly from its May peak of 200,000 yuan per ton to 151,000 yuan. But a more critical question remains: is this the sign of a cyclical peak, or is the industry undergoing a profound revaluation? Answering that requires stepping back to examine the paradigm shift that unfolded across the lithium battery sector between 2025 and 2026. The essence of this shift is not the fluctuation of any single price signal, but a permanent realignment of the industry's competitive playbook—moving from "who expands the fastest" to "who possesses technology, steady profits, and global compliance capabilities." From 60,000 to 200,000 In late June 2025, battery-grade lithium carbonate dropped below 60,000 yuan per ton, touching a three-year low of 59,900 yuan. Lithium salt producers across the sector incurred heavy losses, forcing widespread shutdowns among small and medium-sized manufacturers. From Australian hard-rock mines and small African projects to domestic lepidolite producers, virtually all marginal capacity went offline that summer. A two-and-a-half-year price slump accomplished its single necessary function: clearing out excess supply. By the fourth quarter of 2025, supply and demand dynamics reversed faster than the market had anticipated. The initial spark came from energy storage demand. Data from research firms including InfoLink show that global energy storage cell shipments reached roughly 610 GWh in 2025, up over 90% year-over-year, with fourth-quarter volumes alone topping 200 GWh. Production schedules showed energy storage cells clearing lithium carbonate inventories at an accelerating quarter-over-quarter pace. As growth in electric vehicle batteries moderated, energy storage stepped in not just to absorb excess capacity, but as the industry's primary growth engine. Surging demand was only half the story; supply contracted just as sharply. Small African mines and high-cost domestic lepidolite operations exited the market. Meanwhile, Zimbabwe announced a temporary suspension of lithium concentrate exports in February—a country that accounted for 15.5% of China’s lithium concentrate imports in 2025. Although Australia remained the primary pillar of China's upstream raw material supply at over 50%, the policy further tightened market expectations surrounding upstream supply. Zimbabwe's Ministry of Mines later confirmed that a formal export ban would take effect in January 2027. The tension between supply and demand peaked with the onset of a structural global deficit. Morgan Stanley estimated in early 2026 that the global market would face a shortfall of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) for the year. Soochow Securities calculated total annual lithium mine supply at approximately 2.14 million tons, representing 440,000 tons of new capacity—most of which was not slated to come online until after the third quarter. That timing gap fueled the price rally during the first half of the year. Driven by these converging forces and inventory restocking across midstream channels, lithium carbonate surged from 70,000 yuan per ton in October 2025 to 200,000 yuan by May 2026. Unlike the speculative frenzy that drove prices to 600,000 yuan in 2022, this recovery occurred after capacity had been fully built out, anchored firmly by real end-user demand. Gaogong Industry Research Institute (GGII) summarized the shift: "This is not a bubble, but a return to fundamental value. The structural surge in energy storage demand, combined with supply-side consolidation, has redefined a rational price band for lithium." Prices doubled quickly due to market sentiment and downstream stockpiling. July’s price correction reflected two main factors: the gradual release of new supply and downstream resistance to inflated raw material costs. Analysts generally expect lithium carbonate to trade within a median range of 120,000 to 160,000 yuan per ton for the full year—a price level that keeps most producers profitable without triggering another round of reckless expansion. Energy Storage as the New Engine In the first half of 2026, China's energy storage battery shipments reached roughly 485 GWh, a year-over-year increase of over 80%. Over the same period, power battery shipments totaled roughly 630 GWh, up over 30%. The gap between the two segments is narrowing rapidly. Structural figures are even more telling. In the first quarter of 2026, Chinese energy storage battery shipments totaled about 209 GWh, up 115% year-over-year and accounting for roughly 40% of total lithium battery shipments. By June, energy storage cells made up nearly 41% of monthly production schedules—up from around 30% a year earlier. According to InfoLink, full-year energy storage cell shipments in 2025 reached roughly 610 GWh, approaching 70% of power battery shipments over the same timeframe. Energy storage is no longer a side business for battery makers; it has emerged as an independent market reshaping demand across the industry. Behind this market realignment lies a fundamental shift in purchasing drivers. Before 2024, domestic energy storage growth was driven primarily by mandatory integration policies, which required wind and solar projects to install storage capacity. That regulatory setup created low-quality demand, leading to poor utilization, weak financial returns, and inconsistent cell quality. Between 2025 and 2026, market dynamics pivoted from regulatory compliance to commercial economics. The shift first materialized in the domestic market. In early 2026, the National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration jointly issued new capacity pricing regulations (NDRC Pricing [2026] No. 114), establishing a national capacity tariff mechanism for standalone energy storage facilities. Local standards were set between 165 and 330 yuan per kilowatt-year, depending on the province. Surveys by Soochow Securities indicated that internal rates of return (IRR) for storage stations in several provinces crossed the 6% threshold required for commercial viability, especially where peak-to-valley price spreads exceeded 0.3 yuan per kWh. IRRs for top-tier projects reached as high as 10%, fundamentally improving overall demand quality. This domestic turning point coincided with an explosion in international demand. Major solar-plus-storage projects launched across the Middle East, particularly in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, with individual project capacities regularly reaching several gigawatt-hours. In emerging markets across Australia, Southeast Asia, and Africa, weak power grids and rising renewable energy penetration transformed energy storage from an optional luxury into a necessity. Soochow Securities calculated that utility-scale storage installations in emerging markets grew 233% year-over-year in 2025, with an additional 69% increase projected for 2026. In Europe, energy security concerns and green energy quotas kept commercial, industrial, and residential demand robust. GGII projects that global energy storage battery shipments in 2026 will reach 800 to 1,100 GWh, representing year-over-year growth of 30% to 70%. Even at the mid-point estimate of 900 GWh, energy storage output is positioned to approach or match power battery production this year. As the industry's primary growth engine shifts, its core operational requirements are evolving as well. Power battery demand is dominated by automakers, whose priority is cost efficiency. The customer base for energy storage, however, is far more diverse: utility operators prioritize long cycle life and safety, data center owners require high discharge rates and extreme reliability, and overseas projects demand lifecycle compliance and supply-chain traceability. Winning in these markets requires technological adaptation, solid project execution, and international compliance capabilities rather than sheer scale. Oversupply or Industry Maturity? Evaluating battery utilization rates requires a closer look at the underlying numbers. In May 2026, the single-month installation rate for Chinese power batteries dropped to roughly 38%. Over the first five months of the year, cumulative power battery installations totaled 259 GWh against 863 GWh produced—yielding an overall utilization rate of about 30%. Factory output continues to outpace vehicle installations, leaving a substantial share of manufacturing lines underutilized. The five-year trajectory of Chinese power battery installation rates tells a clear story: 70% in 2021, 54% in 2022, roughly 52% in 2023, 50% in 2024, 44% in 2025, and 38% by May 2026. This steady decline in installation rates offers clear evidence of an industry transitioning from rapid early growth into maturity. Yet labeling the sector simply as oversupplied misses crucial nuances. The market is not experiencing a uniform glut; rather, it is undergoing sharp structural polarization. High-end shortages coexist alongside low-end surpluses. Demand for premium batteries with energy densities above 160 Wh/kg—primarily ternary chemistries—rebounded sharply, rising from a 6% market share in 2025 to 11%. Meanwhile, low-end products under 125 Wh/kg have effectively been phased out. Demand has also diverged sharply between commercial and passenger vehicles. Driven by subsidy policies, battery demand for electric heavy trucks and delivery vans surged, with battery consumption for electric cargo vans rising 169% year-over-year. By contrast, electric buses—once the industry's primary market—fell to fifth place. While market leadership remains dynamic, the nature of competitive moats is shifting. CATL and BYD together retain a 68% market share, but second-tier players like Gotion High-tech, EVE Energy, Svolt Energy, and Hithium are making gains. Competition is shifting from pure capacity expansion to technological differentiation and operating margins. From another perspective, declining installation rates are a natural hallmark of industry maturity. As annual growth moderates, a drop in capacity utilization from 70% to 40% is to be expected. While systemic capacity pressures continue to weigh on industry-wide profitability, and smaller players face ongoing price competition, market leaders retain the balance sheet strength to navigate the transition. As top-line growth slows, manufacturers lacking proprietary technology, accumulated capital, or global compliance infrastructure risk being squeezed out. This shift explains recent strategic course corrections by major capital allocators. Anode producer Sinomatech canceled a 10.3 billion yuan expansion, cathode supplier Dynanonic abandoned a 10 billion yuan project, and separator manufacturer Semcorp terminated a roughly 2 billion yuan facility in Malaysia. Top-tier players reining in massive investments is a classic sign of an industry transitioning from early expansion to financial discipline. This reallocation of capital does not mean expansion has halted entirely. In the first half of 2026, manufacturers announced over 65 new planned projects representing more than 1,500 GWh of capacity and over 220 billion yuan in total investment. Hunan Yuneng disclosed a 24 billion yuan expansion, while Yahua Group announced additional capacity in Zimbabwe. Expansion continues, but the prerequisites have changed: only enterprises with strong technical barriers, cash reserves, and global compliance infrastructure are positioned to invest while competitors scale back. Technology Race 2.0: Three Fronts If the period between 2022 and 2024 was defined by a race for manufacturing scale, 2025 and 2026 have marked a pivot toward technological differentiation across three distinct fronts. Front One: Structural Shortages in 314Ah Cells The central operational focus for the energy storage supply chain in 2026 has been a structural shortage of 314Ah cells rather than short-term price swings in raw lithium. By March, average spot prices for 314Ah cells from tier-one manufacturers approached 0.40 yuan per Wh, with small-lot orders reaching 0.45 yuan per Wh—a surge of over 25% within six months compared to the 0.30 to 0.34 yuan per Wh seen in August 2025. The immediate driver was rising raw lithium costs—at 180,000 yuan per ton of lithium carbonate, theoretical cell production costs sit between 0.35 and 0.38 yuan per Wh. However, the root cause was a supply gap during the industry's transition to larger formats. As manufacturers shift from 280Ah and 314Ah form factors toward 500Ah+ designs, investment in legacy 314Ah production lines has largely ceased. Because next-generation 500Ah+ cell capacity will not scale up until late 2026, production ramps and customer testing created a temporary bottleneck. During this supply gap, the deficit widened significantly, pushing delivery timelines for select orders into 2027. This dynamic reflects a clear shift in industry economics: market returns are no longer guaranteed simply by bringing capacity online, but by executing format transitions ahead of competitors. CATL has already deployed its 587Ah cell in a 2.4 GWh standalone storage project in Inner Mongolia, while EVE Energy has accelerated mass production of its 628Ah format. With the shift toward larger cell formats underway, manufacturing execution is everything. While 314Ah supply constraints present an immediate operational challenge, solid-state technology represents the long-term competitive battlefield. Front Two: A Return to Realism in Solid-State Batteries Although 2026 has been touted as the inaugural year for commercial solid-state battery deployment, that label requires qualification: current production consists almost entirely of semi-solid (hybrid liquid-solid) chemistries. Models including the NIO ET9, MG4, GAC Hyper, and Chery vehicles have entered the market equipped with semi-solid packs featuring energy densities between 350 and 400 Wh/kg. Because these designs remain compatible with over 90% of existing liquid battery production lines, retooling costs remain manageable and rollout schedules are accelerating. However, the commercial reality of all-solid-state technology remains far more complex than vehicle showroom specifications suggest. In March 2026, Ouyang Minggao, an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, offered a candid assessment: "To be prudent, it is best not to commercialize all-solid-state battery vehicles over the next two years." He cited three major technical hurdles: solid-solid interface stability, where microscopic gaps between solid electrolytes and electrodes cause internal resistance to spike; lithium dendrite formation and safety risks; and the environmental volatility of sulfide electrolytes, which decompose upon exposure to moisture and demand strict manufacturing conditions. Industry leaders report steady if measured progress. CATL’s sulfide-based solid-state cell has surpassed an energy density of 500 Wh/kg, with small-scale production anticipated in 2027. BYD’s 20 GWh facility in Chongqing is scheduled to begin semi-solid production in the third quarter of 2026, targeting pilot runs for all-solid-state cells in 2027. Gotion High-tech plans to initiate operations on a 2 GWh solid-state line by late 2026, while EVE Energy has produced sample 60Ah solid-state cells. A clear timeline has taken shape: 2026 is focused on pilot line verification, 2027 on vehicle testing, and 2030 on potential large-scale commercialization. The implementation of recommended national standard GB/T 43568-2026 (Solid-State Batteries for Electric Vehicles) on July 1, 2026, established an initial regulatory framework for long-term development. Ultimately, 2026 marks less the mass adoption of solid-state technology than a recalibration of market expectations. Meanwhile, an underappreciated demand driver is quietly gathering momentum. Front Three: AIDC Storage as AI Infrastructure In the first five months of 2026, global energy storage shipments for AI data centers (AIDC) reached 10 GWh, surpassing total volume for all of 2025. Industry research firms project that global AIDC storage demand will reach 300 to 400 GWh by 2030—more than twenty times its 2025 level. Capital deployment in the segment is ramping up. CATL invested roughly 4.1 billion yuan to acquire a strategic stake in Senter Power to secure positioning in high-voltage DC power distribution for data centers, while winning a bid for a 2 GW / 4 GWh storage project at a computing center in Guizhou. Fluence signed agreements covering a 12 GW pipeline of potential projects with two major U.S. cloud providers, LG secured eight data center storage contracts totaling 6 GWh—including projects for Oracle—and Panasonic announced 350 billion yen in battery investment aimed at tripling its data center storage revenue. The expansion of AIDC storage is driven by a widening gap between AI computing power demands and utility grid capacity. Power consumption per rack in modern AI facilities has jumped from 5–8 kW in traditional data centers to 40–100 kW, while grid connection approvals and capacity upgrades often take three to five years. Onsite battery systems serve both as backup power and as a bridge to accelerate facility commissioning. Energy storage is moving from an auxiliary fallback to an integrated structural component of data centers. Following NVIDIA’s October 2025 announcement of an 800V DC power architecture—designed to phase out diesel generators and legacy uninterruptible power supplies (UPS)—storage systems are being wired directly into primary distribution networks. This shift expands the market beyond traditional buyers like power utilities and renewable energy developers to encompass cloud providers and infrastructure operators, establishing a distinct category of demand. Globalization 2.0 While domestic market consolidation marks the industry’s initial transition to maturity, international expansion presents a secondary test. Tariff structures, raw material access, and regulatory standards are tightening concurrently across major export markets. Trade barriers represent the most immediate hurdle. The European Union’s countervailing duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles have been in effect for five years and are expanding to include plug-in hybrids. In the United States, the Inflation Reduction Act continues to raise domestic content requirements for power and energy storage batteries. Concurrently, China has reduced its export tax rebates for batteries from 9% to 6% as of April 2026, with complete elimination scheduled for January 2027. Rising trade costs are accelerating a shift from direct product exports to localized overseas manufacturing. At the same time, competition over raw materials is intensifying. The U.S.-led Minerals Security Partnership continues work to build key mineral supply chains outside China, while changing rules in jurisdictions like Zimbabwe highlight shifting export policies. Strategic positioning across raw material supply chains remains an ongoing operational priority. Regulatory compliance presents a quieter but more complex technical hurdle. The European Union’s Battery Passport regulations will become mandatory on February 18, 2027, requiring detailed disclosure of lifecycle carbon footprints, material origins, and recycled content percentages. The impact of these rules depends heavily on how accounting frameworks are defined; systematic discrepancies in baseline emissions databases regarding Chinese energy mixes or manufacturing processes could affect market access. In response, leading Chinese manufacturers are moving from passive compliance to active engagement with international standards. CATL has partnered with BMW and Germany’s Catena-X network to help establish over 90 baseline carbon accounting metrics. BYD invested over 100 million yuan to develop its "i-Carbon Chain" platform for digital carbon tracking across its supply chain. Similarly, REPT BATTERO collaborated with TÜV Rheinland and Circulor on a battery passport initiative, securing third-party verification for 98 independent datasets from an EU Notified Body. Overseas manufacturing footprints are expanding in tandem: CATL’s production complex in Hungary, BYD’s plant in Brazil, Gotion High-tech’s joint venture in the United States, and Envision AESC’s gigafactory in Spain. Chinese battery makers are transitioning from a model of centralized domestic production for export toward localized manufacturing aligned with international standards. This next phase of international expansion hinges on regulatory transparency, supply chain control, and deep local integration. Beyond Maturity In July 2026, as equity valuations diverged from corporate earnings across the lithium sector, market participants wrestled with where the industry stands in its broader evolution. The most visible change is the shift in growth drivers. With energy storage shipments reaching 485 GWh in the first half of the year to account for over 40% of total output, the gap between storage and mobility applications is closing rapidly. This demand-side pivot coincides with capacity rebalancing on the supply side, where power battery installation rates have adjusted from 70% down to the 30%–40% range, signaling an end to early, unbridled expansion while overall margins remain under pressure. These structural shifts are redefining entry barriers across the market. With 314Ah cell prices rising over 25% in six months and AIDC storage demand expanding rapidly, technical capabilities are increasingly determining market positioning. As national standards for solid-state technology take effect and EU Battery Passport deadlines approach, regulatory compliance has become a baseline operational requirement. The trajectory of lithium carbonate—falling to 60,000 yuan, rebounding to 200,000, and settling near 150,000—reflects a market seeking equilibrium. This broader transition was highlighted by a joint policy announcement on July 18, when three Chinese government ministries introduced a new consumption tax structure for batteries. Effective September 1, lithium-ion batteries are subject to a 2% consumption tax, rising to 4% in September 2027, while sodium-ion and solid-state batteries remain exempt through the end of 2028. The policy ends a tax exemption for lithium batteries that spanned more than a decade. Phasing in taxation uses fiscal policy to encourage capacity optimization and technological upgrading by taxing established chemistries while incentivizing next-generation alternatives. For second-tier cell makers operating on narrow margins, the 2% tax burden—equivalent to roughly 0.007 to 0.008 yuan per Wh—will further compress operating margins, reinforcing market consolidation around capitalized leaders. For China's lithium battery industry, 2026 represents a clear inflection point. Enterprises equipped with proprietary technology, international compliance frameworks, and established brand equity face a broader global landscape as the sector matures. Conversely, manufacturers reliant on single customers, lacking technical moats, or unable to meet evolving compliance standards face mounting pressure. The early expansion phase of the lithium battery industry has drawn to a close. Its mature chapter is just beginning. (This article was first published on the TMTPost App. Author | AGI-Signal, Editor | Zhao Hongyu)梅西走下世界杯赛场，变身硅谷投资人。
- 12 8年融资11轮后买“壳” 接盘方太洋科技，是国内军工材料赛道的隐形龙头。
- 13 英格兰则很可能主动让出球权，沿用对阵墨西哥时的防反策略，依靠萨卡、戈登的速度冲击挪威边后卫身后的空当，同时利用贝林厄姆的后插上与凯恩的支点作用寻找得分机会。
- 14 到今年，这种横向扩张模式正遭遇边际效益递减。
- 15 当一支球队放弃了进攻的勇气，被扳平乃至绝杀便成了必然的结局。
- 16 博睿康的股东名单里出现了红杉中国、松禾资本、华控基金、百度风投、达晨财智、孚腾资本、中关村发展基金等一众知名机构，上海国资背景的国孚领航与浦东创投均跻身前十大股东。
- 17 最终哪条路线能落地，还得看物理真实性够不够、端侧实时性能跟不跟得上，这些都需要时间检验。
- 18 曼联会比利物浦强？ 基于上赛季下半程的表现，这个判断完全合理。
- 19 “对于我想做什么，我心里已经有想法了。
最新评论
用户评论48101
请先登录后再发表评论
发布
相关推荐
上赛季，科莫托在意乙共出场28次，其中9次首发，累计出场时间1254分钟，平均每次登场约45分钟。
湖北农发集团原总经理陈华志接受审查调查
94774
滔搏将此次调整定性为“重大短期负面影响”。[2026]
CBA男篮动态速递！郭艾伦安慰孙铭徽，张镇麟合同到期，胡金秋王哲林泪洒赛场，辽宁两旧将再夺总冠军_网易订阅
40253
这样的话，米兰的成本会低很多，也不用承担转会费的风险，踢得好可以考虑买断，踢不好就退回去，比较灵活。
突然，逆市拉升！A股盘中，异动！这些股票，发生了啥？
22485
典型的“森保一模式”是上半场隐忍，下半场60分钟后突然提速，利用体能和轮换优势冲击对手。
断舍离两年，我家最该扔的7样东西，第一名居然是它？
15492
它不像肌肉拉伤那样有明确的恢复期，而是在每一次发力、每一次奔跑时，如影随形地撕扯着球员的意志。
DeepSeek估值，被一家安徽箱包公司给全部暴露了
77275
不过它至少让当事人不必立刻把所有问题归结为“我不行”。
炸裂！4年3冠+DPOY+MVP+FMVP！联盟第一人啊！
41578
首轮对阵伊拉克，挪威控球率达到六成，13次射门5次射正就打入4球，进攻转化率相当可观。
8-18岁记忆力差怎么选课？四家优质学能机构适配人群解析
62837
沙特则是典型的低位防守反击打法。
秒删！热火泄露詹姆斯7月27日加盟！但他反悔了！
48499
后防线上，鲁本·迪亚斯领衔的防线稳健可靠，坎塞洛和努诺·门德斯两翼齐飞，助攻能力极强。
世界杯被低估巨星炸裂表演：4场5助 创32年纪录！姆巴佩感谢
59727
+55910
+65473
+72685
